Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Is Huma Abedin going to take the fall alone or will Mrs Clinton also go down?

It appears that Abedin and both Podestas have been indicted. What next?
SandInMyShoes · 36-40, F
Or will there be more Arkancide?
katielass · F
@jackjjackson I know but I didn't want to get technical. lol You've heard of MRSA? She's got LSRC. Lord and Saviour resistant cooties.
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
I don’t want any of the panoply of things THAT carries. @katielass
katielass · F
@jackjjackson No thinking person does.
Mistermanners · 41-45, M
Hillary won’t go down because they don’t want to “kill themselves” mysteriously.
Northwest · M
OK never mind. It appears as if Fox News indicted them all, following a lead they got from a tweet the President sent yesterday (or was that the other way around?)
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
It appears that Mueller has many indictments which have been filed and sealed @Northwest
Northwest · M
Appears that they have been indicted? Where did you get that from? The only big news item popping this morning, is that Bannon called the 2016 Trump Tower meeting between Trump campaign officials and a Russian lawyer treasonous (in Bannon's new book)
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
Federal court docket. @Northwest
Northwest · M
@jackjjackson So, this is from last October. Someone noticed that between Papadopoulos' indictment (#182) and Manafort's (#201), there were four sealed indictments. Given that 40% of federal indictments are sealed, why would you assume that the four sealed indictments are for Huma and Podestas are the target, and why hasn't been any movement on them for more than two months?
@jackjjackson There is no evidence that Abedin and Podesta have been indicted. You are being played by the media you consume. While it is likely that they are in trouble, the factual existence of an indictment isn't verifiable.
windinhishair · 61-69, M
There has been no indication of indictments against the Podestas or Abedin. Or Trump Jr. or Kushner or trump himself, for that matter. Shouldn't we wait for Mueller's report and further indictments before we start talking about the impacts of indictments that haven't occurred?
windinhishair · 61-69, M
@jackjjackson We will very likely find out in 2018.
Northwest · M
@jackjjackson [quote]It would be something else if Mueller turned out to be the President’s designated swamp drainer @windinhishair @Northwest[/quote]

Based on the new Bannon revelations, and I'm quoting him, the Mueller investigation is focused on money laundering and according to Bannon, the chances of Trump not being involved in the meetings between his son/son-in-law and the Russian team are zero.
katielass · F
@jackjjackson That would be the icing on the cake. If only....
katielass · F
As always everyone around her will be indicted and some will probably go to prison but somehow she will escape justice. She is guiltier than all of them put together but she will have to wait for god himself to dispense justice.
cherokeepatti · 61-69, F
Depends on the goods that they have on them, doesn't it?
Burgundy · 56-60, F
Really? They've been indicted? Can you please provide a source for that?
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
It appears that Mueller has many indictments which have been filed and sealed @Burgundy
Virgo79 · 61-69, M
Hard to say, they are professionals

 
Post Comment