Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Who gets indicted tomorrow?

Hillary and company for sure..
windinhishair · 61-69, M
@Pitchblue Have they ever stopped?
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
@windinhishair @Pitchblue @snowbelt @snowbelt

Sadly the insults fly from all sides with each side claiming the other side’s insults are worse.
@jackjjackson @windinhishair @Pitchblue @katielass Get a room already ya pervs....
RodionRomanovitch · 56-60, M
I asked this back in April and the odds I gave then are still a pretty good reflection I think of who might be indicted first. (I only added Trump Jr. after the Trump Tower meeting was revealed.)

https://similarworlds.com/18-Politics/751852-Who-do-you-think-is-most-likely-to-end-up-in-jail

Personally I would love it to be Kushner but I suppose that can wait 'til later. The smart money has to be on Flynn or Manafort.
snowbelt · 61-69, M
@RodionRomanovitch We will know soon!
Unless it's obvious, like Flynn or Manafort, I'm guessing it will be a secretary or someone really low level.

If Mueller is doing it right, he's looking for people to turn, so that when he indicts his big fish, he can nail them.

This will drag out, imo. It's not going to be over unless Trump moves to shut it down. And that would make more trouble for him.
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
@Clemency

What time did reality dawn on you Election night? I’m not professing to know the outcome however you seem to be celebrating a little early. The last time you did that you looked somewhat foolish. Just sayin.
This message was deleted by its author.
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
@Clemency

Hmmmm. Now threatening war? So yes you did start celebrating on election night only to have it all crash down around you. We’re you crying alone or at a party with fellow travelers?
Flynn and Manafort would be excellent. Especially because Trump kept in contact with both. What will Trump do to deflect from that?
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
@Pitchblue

Mother lol

It’s gonna take a lot of small fish to move up the food chain to Pence.
katielass · F
@Pitchblue President Trump has no reason to "deflect" from the fact that he has talked to both Flynn and Manafort.
katielass · F
@jackjjackson The indictments on dumbocrats will come later.
katielass · F
@luckranger71 Mueller expanded his investigation into clinton, her campaign and the dnc several weeks ago.
katielass · F
@TheOneyouwerewarnedabout The uranium is a different issue. Both houses of congress are not investigating and it is likely that a special prosecutor will be appointed to investigate. that involves national security so it will not be a joke.
RodionRomanovitch · 56-60, M
@TheOneyouwerewarnedabout It's Podesta you muppet. I don't think any more proof is needed to conclude you know precisely nothing about which you speak.
HoraceGreenley · 56-60, M
[image deleted]
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
@HoraceGreenley

That would make CNN’s head spin 😆
CountScrofula · 41-45, M
Probably Flynn and/or Manafort but who knows. They could have uncovered something out of left field. Like, a Democrat is possible but less probable considering Trump's campaign is the target.
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
@CountScrofula

Very reasonable response. Tomorrow should be interesting.
Dainbramadge · 56-60, M
Looks like a bunch I guess.
katielass · F
@jackjjackson Nope. Fox and abc reported it. Well, it makes sense. Mueller is investigating Russian interference with our election and that is certainly not limited to trump and associates. It's logical that once all roads to trump were exhausted and the discovery that the clinton campaign and the dnc were involved with the firm who got info supplied by Russia and paid for it, well why would it be a surprise that his investigation would expand to include the dems. I believe the dems are going to be terribly disappointed.
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
@katielass

It should be crazy.
katielass · F
@jackjjackson Oh yes.
luckranger71 · 51-55, M
Prizes to those of you who called Manafort. If anyone had Gates they deserve special kudos.
I doubt anybody. If anybody somebody far from the WH. Some schmuck in a GOP campaign office will be spun as a sole gunman, a mastermind.
This message was deleted by its author.
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
@Pitchblue

I wonder if the democrats will ever look into understanding why they lost.
@jackjjackson That's a problem the Democrats have, do they just say fuckit to all integrity and say anything to get votes like Trump did or not. But having the President colluding with an adversarial country is a bigger problem.
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
@Pitchblue

Even Mrs Clinton says there were more reasons than that. Mrs Clinton was simply a bad candidate. It seems like virtually any other candidate would have beaten Trump and no one would be grasping at these straws.

 
Post Comment