Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Do you think trump is a good president?

What’s your honest opinion on president Donald trump?
Yes. He has his imperfections, but the people who are screaming for his head are the ultimate proof to me that I voted for the right person. Donald Trump is political Viagra. He has made all the pricks stand out in plain sight! All the right people hate him.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Yes I am happy with him as president. I think he is doing a great job.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Allelse · 36-40, M
No. He's an imbecile, he's the end result of over a decade of fear by an enemy that wears no uniform and fights by its own rules; and so in response to this, alot of fearful, ignorant people have voted into power an extremist imbecile in the hopes of battling one extreme with another.
Picklebobble2 · 56-60, M
How can you judge ?
He hasn't done anything !
No policy that has improved or detracted from where Obama left it.
No international crisis on which to intervene and impose/improve a situation.
No monetary policy decisions that have helped savers or reduced debt.
Nothing to encourage business.
Just an endless bunch of meaningless photo ops and tweets.
GJOFJ3 · 61-69, M
Over all yes
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
So far so good
SW-User
I think Trump has a hard time getting his points across on certain issues. Which causes confusion. He's dramatic at times, for example saying he's going to build a "huge" wall on the border of Mexico or he's going to "bomb the hell" out of Isis.

He doesn't allow alot of crticism that he recieves from news reporters. Yelling over them when they ask a question he doesn't agree with or prohibiting them from entering the conference room.

And above all, Trump gets on Twitter too much to complain about people who mock him or saying this person needs to be fired because of xyz instead of just letting it go.

So do I think he's a good president? No. But I can't say he's the worst.
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
This is a trick question. Right? But seriously, sometimes you really need to break something to small pieces before you can get it replaced.. And he is right about one thing.. The system IS broken. So maybe long term he will not be judged so harshly. But seen as the guy who FUBARed it, so something better could take its place.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Literally what has he done ? 😂 all I’ve seen him do is spend every waking moment on twitter and make promises he can’t keep similar to majority of the presidents we’ve had. He just says things people want to hear and puts forth no action.
Someoneelse17 · 56-60, F
No,but I don't fight with people who do.
lorne13 · 61-69, M
Hes a piece of sbit
Spokeskitties75 · 46-50, M
I have no honest opinion
basilfawlty89 · 31-35, M
No, there should be no presidents.
Allelse · 36-40, M
Yeah one article in new scientist doesnt mean dick agaisnt the overwhelming evidence of human nature; and because of that evidence I dont believe for a moment that those early city states were some 'glory glory' utopian example of anarchism. They'd have been brutal as feck, eye for an eye, big thug in charge city states always about one mistunderstanding away from killing one and other.
basilfawlty89 · 31-35, M
@Allelse And your citation for this assertion is? Human nature changes, we are a social species, cooperation is what creates civilization. We are more interdependent on one another than ever before
Allelse · 36-40, M
Citations of my assertion? Well on a 'Time to create a utopian society through philosophy!' Being a disaster we have - Mao, Stalin, Lenin, Hitler, Castro, Che Guevera to name a few. Many of who were not only blood thirsty tyrants, but so inept that the desth tolls under their reign are so high due to doing things as stupid as say, taking farmland off of people who knew how to farm it, throwing them in jail and putting it under the control of people who didnt have a damn clue.

Now!!! That idiotic article rambled on about people 'coming together' in agricultural harmony. Hmmmmmm! Now! Lets look at the human societies which are closest to the early days eh? To get an idea of human nature.

Native Americans. Well there's enough about their 'practises'. Espescially the Apache and the Cumanche, make sure to pay attention to them oh and the Ute, they were pretty nasty too.

Then we have your new guinea lads, and your Bornea natives which were always tearing each other a new one, not to mention the ritual pedophilia and cannibalism.

Oh and the Australian aboriginals were a savage lot and they're as close to cavemen as you can get. Proving that stone age up to hunter gatherer and bit further we're still a brutal lot.

Now! The Aztecs were one of your powerful city state types, as were the Mayans, and well? They were a nasty bunch.

Alright, the Sumerians and the ancient Egyptians were not a bad lot, they had law courts and laws and such, which could still be pretty brutal. I mean your Babylonians had a real eye for an eye thing going in their laws.

And yet regardless of all of that! We're expected to believe from that article that during some small time of agricultural development between when we were hunter garherers and when we formed into city states, that it was some magical, peaceful time of human compassion and cooperstion?

Hah! I doubt it.

And to cite some nasty examples of humans following the biggest thugs, during time of termoil causing unification behind them?

Muhammed
Vlad the Impaler
Mao
Phillip of Macedon
Ghengis Khan
Atilla the Hun
Napoleon
Ivan the tertible
Tamerlane
Stalin
Sulla
Not to mention Julius Caesar and that nephew of his, just to name a few. Oh and Trump. A big loud mouth thug and look how they cheer for him

Hah! Oh i dont deny that at this moment we're at our best behaved, atleast in the west but that's only for as long as the west stays ontop.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment

 
Post Comment