If a king is gay and marries another guy what is that guy to the royal family?

DeWayfarer · 61-69, M

Two historical cases. One was called a husband, the other was called a wife.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/retropolis/wp/2018/08/18/the-king-and-his-husband-the-gay-history-of-british-royals/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.41b68d66e4ec

[quote]Several years after Gaveston’s death, Edward formed a close relationship with another favorite and aide, Hugh Despenser. How close? Walker pointed to the annalist of Newenham Abbey in Devon in 1326, who called Edward and Despenser “the king and his husband,” while another chronicler noted that Despenser “bewitched Edward’s heart.”[/quote]

Second case same URL

[quote]James VI and I, who reigned over Scotland and later England and Ireland until his death in 1625, attracted similar scrutiny for his male favorites, a term used for companions and advisers who had special preference with monarchs.

...

But James’s most famous favorite was Villiers. James met him in his late 40s and several years later promoted him to Duke of Buckingham — an astounding rise for someone of his rank. Bergeron records the deeply affectionate letters between the two; in a 1623 letter, James refers bluntly to “marriage” and calls Buckingham his “wife:”
[/quote]

xixgun · M

Well, 1) it wouldn't happen. If a king were gay, he would marry a woman to expand and strengthen the kingdom; meanwhile both he and the Queen would have their various lovers in a mutual arrangement. They would appear in public together as husband and wife, but privately they would live their own lives.

History backs me up on this.